J Trauma Acute Care Surg. 2018 Jun;84(6S Suppl 1):S89-S92

# Staff officers as blood suppliers: effects of repeated donations and autologous reinfusion of untransfused units.

Strandenes G, Sivertsen J, Eliassen H, Braathen H, Hervig T

BACKGROUND: Limited blood inventory and resupply chains in combat settings can result in preventable deaths from traumatic hemorrhage. One way of mitigating this could be to establish donor pools where blood is collected in advance of high-risk missions and then reinfused back to the donor if not needed to treat casualties.

METHODS: Four hundred fifty milliliters plus 56 mL of blood was collected, rested for 2 hours in room temperature, and stored at 4°C. The blood was reinfused 22 to 24 hours after donation and the donor observed for adverse reactions. Samples were collected before and 20 minutes after each donation for hematology, immunoglobulin G, ferritin, C-reactive protein, total protein, lactate dehydrogenase, bilirubin, haptoglobin, and activated partial thromboplastin time.

RESULTS: Nine participants went through a total of 36 donation and reinfusion procedures. Four donors participated in five rounds, two in four rounds, two in three rounds, and one in two rounds. A significant drop was seen in hemoglobin (14.6 ± 0.9 to 13.9 ± 0.9) and ferritin (179 ± 70 to 149 ± 78) from before the first donation to after the last reinfusion (p < 0.05). Other parameters were unaffected.

CONCLUSION: This small pilot study suggests that repeated donations and reinfusions may be both feasible and safe. Blood collected in this way should be labeled with the donor's full name and social security number (or similar) and the identity visually verified by the donor immediately before both donation and reinfusion. To further reduce risk, this form of donation should be restricted to scenarios where there is no other option for making blood available.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Therapeutic/Care management study, level V.