Aydın A, Bilge S, Aydın C, Bilge M, Çevik E, Eryılmaz M.
Ulus Travma Acil Cerrahi Derg. 2018 Mar;24(2):97-103.
BACKGROUND: Endotracheal intubation (ETI) procedure in the combat area differs from prehospital trauma life support procedures because of the danger of gunfire and the dark environment. We aimed to determine the success, difficulty degree, and duration of ETI procedures with a classical laryngoscope (CL) in a bright room and with a modified laryngoscope (ML) model in a dark room.
METHODS: All interventions were performed by a combatant medical staff of 10 members. We developed an ML model to obtain a tool that can be used in combination with night vision goggles (NVGs) to perform ETI at night. The procedures were performed using a CL with the naked eye in a bright room and using a ML with NVGs in a dark room. The ETI procedure that used the ML was performed by engaging and locking the blade on the handle either in the mouth (ML-IM) or outside of the mouth (ML-OM).
RESULTS: The mean completion times for the ETI procedures, namely Day-CL, ML-OM+NVG, and ML-IM+NVG, performed by the operators were 14.46, 26.9, and 32.38 s, respectively. The ML-OM+NVG and ML-IM+NVG procedures were significantly longer than the Day-CL procedure (p<0.05). The ML-IM+NVG procedure was significantly longer than the ML-OM+NVG procedure (p<0.05). All ETI procedures were found to be 100% successful. The Day-CL procedure was easier than the ML-OM+NVG and ML-IM+NVG procedures (p>0.05).
CONCLUSION: The ETI procedure is applicable using NVGs in dark conditions on the battlefield. Medical interventions performed using NVGs in the dark should be a part of the basic training provided in tactical emergency medicine.
Blackburn MB, April MMD, Brown CDJ, DeLorenzo RA, Ryan KL, Blackburn AN, Schauer MSG
J Trauma Acute Care Surg. 2018 Mar 8. Epub ahead of print
BACKGROUND: Airway management is of critical importance in combat trauma patients. Airway compromise is the second leading cause of potentially survivable death on the battlefield and accounts for approximately 1 in 10 preventable deaths. Reports from the Iraq and Afghanistan wars indicate 4-7% incidence of airway interventions on casualties transported to combat hospitals. The goal of this study was to describe airway management in the prehospital combat setting and document airway devices used on the battlefield.
METHODS: This study is a retrospective review of casualties that required a prehospital life-saving airway intervention during combat operations in Afghanistan. We obtained data from the Prehospital Trauma Registry (PHTR) that was linked to the Department of Defense Trauma Registry (DoDTR) for outcome data for the time period between January 2013 and September 2014.
RESULTS: 705 total trauma patients were included, 16.9% required a prehospital airway management procedure. There were 132 total airway procedures performed, including 83 (63.4%) endotracheal intubations and 26 (19.8%) nasopharyngeal airway placements. Combat medics were involved in 48 (36.4%) of airway cases and medical officers in 73 (55.3%). Most (94.2%) patients underwent airway procedures due to battle injuries caused by explosion or gunshot wounds. Casualties requiring airway management were more severely injured and less likely to survive as indicated by injury severity score, responsiveness level, Glascow coma score, and outcome.
CONCLUSIONS: Percentages of airway interventions more than tripled from previous reports from the wars in Afghanistan and Iraq. These changes are significant and further study is needed to determine the causes. Casualties requiring airway interventions sustained more severe injuries and experienced lower survival than patients who did not undergo an airway procedure, findings suggested in previous reports.
LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level III, prognostic and epidemiological.
Mitchener TA, Dickens NE, Simecek JW
Mil Med. 2018 Mar 1;183(3-4):e219-e224
Background: Few studies have examined the causes or mechanisms of oral-maxillofacial (OMF) injury among deployed military populations. This study reports causes of OMF injuries to U.S. Department of Defense personnel deployed to Afghanistan in Operation Enduring Freedom (OEF) or to Iraq in Operation Iraqi Freedom (OIF) and Operation New Dawn (OND). This study provides follow-on analysis of a previous report of OMF injury rates among U.S. military personnel in Iraq and Afghanistan from 2001 to 2014.
Methods: The populations studied were military personnel deployed to Afghanistan in OEF or Iraq in OIF and OND, who sought care at a level III military treatment facility for one or more OMF injuries. Injuries were identified in the Department of Defense Trauma Registry using diagnosis codes associated with OMF battle and non-battle injuries. Causes associated with these injuries were identified by evaluation of the data field "dominant injury mechanism." All OMF injuries incurred from October 19, 2001, to June 30, 2014, were included. Findings/Results: Approximately 89% of all OMF battle injuries in both OIF/OND and OEF were due to explosives or explosive devices. The three leading causes of OMF non-battle injuries for both OIF/OND and OEF were motor vehicle crashes/accidents (MVCs), falls, and "other blunt" trauma. MVCs as well as other blunt trauma accounted for a greater percentage of OMF non-battle injuries in OIF/OND than in OEF (p < 0.01). OMF non-battle injuries due to falls were more likely to occur in OEF (p = 0.05). Helicopter/plane crashes were responsible for a significantly higher percentage of OMF non-battle injuries in OEF compared with OIF/OND (p < 0.01). Discussion/Impact/Recommendations: Across both theaters of war, Iraq and Afghanistan, the main causes of OMF battle and non-battle injuries were consistent. Battle injuries were primarily due to explosives or explosive devices and the three main causes of non-battle injuries were MVCs, falls, and other blunt trauma. However, the distribution of causes differed by war theater. Future studies should focus on potential reasons for cause distribution disparities in
MVCs and helicopter/plane crashes as they can only be partially explained by topography and infrastructure differences between Iraq and Afghanistan. Further surveillance is needed to understand the scope of OMF injuries in military-armed conflicts and operations.
Pakkanen T, Kämäräinen A, Huhtala H, Silfvast T, Nurmi J, Virkkunen I, Yli-Hankala A
Scand J Trauma Resusc Emerg Med. 2017 Sep 15;25(1):94
BACKGROUND: After traumatic brain injury (TBI), hypotension, hypoxia and hypercapnia have been shown to result in secondary brain injury that can lead to increased mortality and disability. Effective prehospital assessment and treatment by emergency medical service (EMS) is considered essential for favourable outcome. The aim of this study was to evaluate the effect of a physician-staffed helicopter emergency medical service (HEMS) in the treatment of TBI patients.
METHODS: This was a retrospective cohort study. Prehospital data from two periods were collected: before (EMS group) and after (HEMS group) the implementation of a physician-staffed HEMS. Unconscious prehospital patients due to severe TBI were included in the study. Unconsciousness was defined as a Glasgow coma scale (GCS) score ≤ 8 and was documented either on-scene, during transportation or by an on-call neurosurgeon on hospital admission. Modified Glasgow Outcome Score (GOS) was used for assessment of six-month neurological outcome and good neurological outcome was defined as GOS 4-5.
RESULTS: Data from 181 patients in the EMS group and 85 patients in the HEMS group were available for neurological outcome analyses. The baseline characteristics and the first recorded vital signs of the two cohorts were similar. Good neurological outcome was more frequent in the HEMS group; 42% of the HEMS managed patients and 28% (p = 0.022) of the EMS managed patients had a good neurological recovery. The airway was more frequently secured in the HEMS group (p < 0.001). On arrival at the emergency department, the patients in the HEMS group were less often hypoxic (p = 0.024). In univariate analysis HEMS period, lower age and secured airway were associated with good neurological outcome.
CONCLUSION: The introduction of a physician-staffed HEMS unit resulted in decreased incidence of prehospital hypoxia and increased the number of secured airways. This may have contributed to the observed improved neurological outcome during the HEMS period.
TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov IDNCT02659046. Registered January 15th, 2016.
Dhimar AA, Sangada BR, Upadhyay MR, Patel SH
J Anaesthesiol Clin Pharmacol. 2017 Oct-Dec;33(4):467-472
Background and Aims: Supraglottic airways (SGAs) are generally used for airway management; but can also be used as a conduit for tracheal intubation. Our primary aim was to evaluate i-Gel and laryngeal mask airway (LMA) classic as conduits for tracheal intubation using ventilating bougie by assessing number of attempts and time for insertion of SGAs, ventilating bougie and endotracheal tube (ETT), and total intubation time.
Material and Methods: A randomized clinical trial was carried out in 58 patients requiring general anesthesia and endotracheal intubation for planned surgery. They were randomly divided into Group I and Group C. After induction of anesthesia, i-Gel was inserted in Group I and LMA Classic in Group C; ventilating bougie was passed through SGA followed by the removal of SGA and railroading of ETT over ventilating bougie. Parameters observed were number of attempts and time taken for device insertion, total intubation time, and hemodynamic variables.
Results: Twenty-nine patients were included in each group. First attempt success rate for SGA insertion (86.2% in Group I and 75.9% in Group C (P = 0.5)), ventilating bougie insertion (79.32% in Group I and 82.8% in Group C (P = 0.99)) and ETT insertion (100% in Group I and 96.5% in Group C) was not different in the two groups. Total intubation time was 93.3 ± 9.0 s in Group I and 108. 96 ± 16.5 s in Group C (P < 0.0001).
Conclusions: i-Gel and LMA Classic both can be used as a conduit for tracheal intubation using ventilating bougie with stable hemodynamic parameters.
Ha SH), Kim MS, Suh J, Lee JS
Can J Anaesth. 2018 May;65(5):543-550
PURPOSE: The self-pressurized air-Q® (air-Q SP) intubating laryngeal airway is a relatively new supraglottic airway (SGA) device. The intracuff pressure of air-Q dynamically equilibrates with the airway pressure and adjusts to the patient's pharyngeal and periglottic anatomy, potentially providing improved airway fit and seal. The aim of this prospective randomized study was to compare the clinical performance of air-Q to the LMA® Classic™ SGA.
METHODS: Adult patients requiring general anesthesia for elective surgery were prospectively enrolled and randomly assigned to either air-Q SP or the LMA Classic SGA. Oropharyngeal leak pressure (primary endpoint), success rate, insertion features (insertion time, ease of insertion, requirement for device manipulation), sealing function, gastric insufflation, bronchoscopic view, and oropharyngeal complications at device insertion and following its removal (sore throat, dysphagia, dysphonia) were compared.
RESULTS: The mean (standard deviation [SD]) oropharyngeal leak pressure just after insertion was similar in the air-Q SP and LMA [16.8 (4.9) vs 18.6 (5.5) cm H2O, respectively; mean difference, 1.8 cm H2O; 95% CI, -0.5 to 4.2; P = 0.13] and did not differ at ten minutes following device insertion. Median [interquartile range (IQR)] peak inspiratory pressure just after insertion was lower in the air-Q SP (11.0 [10.0-13.0] vs 13.0 [11.0-14.0] cmH2O, median difference, 1.0 cm H2O; 95% CI, 0.0 to 2.0; P = 0.03) but no difference was observed at ten minutes. The median [IQR] insertion time was faster with the air-Q SP (15.9 [13.6-20.3] sec vs 24 [21.2-27.1] sec; median difference, 8.1 sec; 95% CI, 5.6 to 9.9; P < 0.001) and improved bronchoscopic viewing grade were seen with the air-Q SP immediately after insertion (P < 0.001). No differences between the groups were observed with respect to the rate of successful insertion at first attempt, overall insertion success rate, ease of insertion, and complications.
CONCLUSIONS: The air-Q SP had similar leak pressures but a faster insertion time and superior bronchoscopic viewing grade when compared with the LMA Classic. The air-Q SP is a suitable alternative to the LMA Classic in adult patients and may be a superior conduit for tracheal intubation.
TRIAL REGISTRATION: www.clinicaltrials.gov (NCT02206438). Registered 1 August 2014.
Kim JG, Kim W, Kang GH, Jang YS, Choi HY, Kim H, Kim M
Clin Exp Emerg Med. 2018 Mar 30;5(1):29-34
OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to evaluate the efficacy of i-gel blind intubation (IGI) as a rescue device for definitive airway management in ground intubation for pre-hospital trauma patients.
METHODS: A prospective randomized crossover study was conducted with 18 paramedics to examine intubation performance of two blind intubation techniques through a supraglottic airway devices (IGI and laryngeal mask airway Fastrach), compared with use of a Macintosh laryngoscope (MCL). Each intubation was conducted at two levels of patient positions (ground- and stretcher-level). Primary outcomes were the intubation time and the success rate for intubation.
RESULTS: The intubation time (sec) of each intubation technique was not significantly different between the two positions. In both patient positions, the intubation time of IGI was shortest among the three intubation techniques (17.9±5.2 at the ground-level and 16.9±3.8 at the stretcher-level). In the analysis of cumulative success rate and intubation time, IGI was the fastest to reach 100% success among the three intubation techniques regardless of patient position (all P<0.017). The success of intubation was only affected by the intubation technique, and IGI achieved more success than MCL (odds ratio, 3.6; 95% confidence interval, 1.1 to 11.6; P=0.03).
CONCLUSION: The patient position did not affect intubation performance. Additionally, the intubation time with blind intubation through supraglottic airway devices, especially with IGI, was significantly shorter than that with MCL.
Sen S, Mitra K, Ganguli S, Mukherji S
Anesth Essays Res. 2018 Jan-Mar;12(1):288-290
Haemophilia is an inherited bleeding disorder with variable deficiency of Factor VIII in the plasma and is characterised by bleeding into joints, muscles and tissues either spontaneously or in response to trivial trauma. Perioperative care requires multidisciplinary involvement. Perioperative management involves the risk of excessive bleeding from surgical site as well as spontaneous bleeding into the brain in response to surgical stress in patients with previous history of intracerebral haemorrhage. Airway management of such patients during anaesthetic intervention is a challenge and entails the risk of life threatening haemorrhage into the airway. The I gel Supraglottic airway device may be best suited for the purpose considering its soft elastomeric non-inflatable cuff, ease of insertion, availability of gastric suction port and minimal leak fraction on controlled ventilation. The I Gel may be solution to avoiding airway instrumentation in patients with bleeding disorders. It may be an alternative to endotracheal intubation in patients with Haemophilia undergoing surgery.
Verma S, Sharma SP
J Anaesthesiol Clin Pharmacol. 2018 Jan-Mar;34(1):58-61
Background and Aims: Proseal laryngeal mask airway (LMA) and laryngeal tube suction (LTS) are both supraglottic devices with an esophageal suction port. In the present prospective, randomized study, the effectiveness of airway seal, hemodynamic variables, ability to pass orogastric tube, and postoperative complications with the two devices were evaluated.
Material and Methods: This was a prospective, randomized, single-blind study conducted in a hospital-based setting. Sixty patients (American Society of Anesthesiologists Grade I and II) undergoing elective general surgery were randomly allocated to Group A (Proseal LMA) or Group B (LTS), and airway seal pressure (primary outcome), peak pressure, hemodynamic parameters (blood pressure, pulse rate and pulse oximetry) during and 5 min after insertion, insertion time, ease of insertion, and postoperative complications (sore throat and hoarseness of voice for a period of 24 hours) (secondary outcomes) were noted. The quantitative data was summarized as mean and standard deviation, and analyzed using Student's t-test. All the qualitative data were summarized as proportions and analyzed using Chi-square test. The levels of significance and α-error were kept 95% and 5%, respectively, for all statistical analyses. P ≤ 0.05 was considered significant (S).
Results: Proseal LMA had shorter insertion time (16.4 ± 5.6 vs. 20.0 ± 3.9 s), higher seal pressure (27.6 ± 4.6 vs. 24.1 ± 5.6 cm of H2O), lesser peak pressure (16.3 ± 2.3 vs. 18.5 ± 3.9 cm of H2O), higher success rate of orogastric tube passage (86.7 vs. 76.7%), and lesser postoperative sore throat (3.3 vs. 10%).
Conclusions: Both Proseal LMA and LTS were acceptable alternatives for airway management in elective surgeries with controlled ventilation, but the quality of ventilation was found to be significantly better with Proseal LMA (in terms of higher seal pressure, lesser peak pressure, lesser insertion time, and lesser complications).
Wong DT, Ooi A, Singh KP, Dallaire A, Meliana V, Lau J, Chung F, Singh M, Wong J
Can J Anaesth. 2018 Mar 26 Epub ahead of print
PURPOSE: Studies comparing the recently introduced Ambu® AuraGain™ (Auragain) with the LMA® Supreme™ (Supreme) supraglottic airway (SGA) have reported conflicting results regarding differences in oropharyngeal leak pressure (OLP). This randomized-controlled trial investigated the OLP of the Auragain compared with the Supreme in patients undergoing ambulatory surgery.
METHODS: Adult patients with a body mass index ≤ 40 kg·m-2 presenting for ambulatory surgery and requiring an SGA were randomized to receive either the Auragain or the Supreme. Anesthesia was induced with lidocaine (1 mg·kg-1), fentanyl (1-2 μg·kg-1), and propofol (2-3 mg·kg-1). The SGA was inserted using a standard technique with the cuff inflated to 60 cmH2O. The groups were compared for the primary outcome of OLP.
RESULTS: One hundred sixty-five patients (n = 81, Auragain; n = 84, Supreme) completed the study. Demographics were similar between the groups. The mean (standard deviation [SD]) OLP was significantly higher in the Auragain than in the Supreme group [26.4 (2.8) cmH2O vs 21.6 (3.4) cmH2O, respectively; difference in means (MD), 4.8 cmH2O; 95% confidence interval (CI), 3.9 to 5.8; P < 0.001]. The mean (SD) insertion time was longer in the Auragain than in the Supreme group [13 (4) sec vs 11 (3) sec, respectively; MD, 2 sec; 95% CI, 1 to 3 sec; P <0.001].
CONCLUSION: In patients undergoing ambulatory anesthesia, the OLP was higher but took longer to insert with the Auragain than with the Supreme. A higher OLP may allow for SGAs to be utilized in a wider range of patients and procedures.
TRIAL REGISTRATION: www.clinicaltrials.gov (NCT02816463). Registered 28 June 2016.
Okano H, Uzawa K, Watanabe K, Motoyasu A, Tokumine J, Lefor AK, Yorozu T
BMC Emerg Med. 2018 Feb 8;18(1):5
BACKGROUND: Surgical cricothyroidotomy is considered to be the last resort for management of the difficult airway. A major point for a successful surgical cricothyroidotomy is to identify the location of the cricothyroid membrane.
CASE PRESENTATION: We encountered a patient with progressive respiratory distress who was anticipated to have a difficult airway due to a large neck abscess. We prepared for both awake intubation and surgical cricothyroidotomy. The cricothyroid membrane could not be identified by palpation, but was readily identified using ultrasound.
CONCLUSION: Ultrasound-guided identification of the cricothyroid membrane may be useful in a patient with a difficult airway due to neck swelling.