Telehealth Impact on Primary Care Related Ambulance Transports

Tiffany Champagne-Langabeer, James R Langabeer, Kirk E Roberts, Joshua S Gross, Guy R Gleisberg, Michael G Gonzalez, David Persse

Prehosp Emerg Care Sep-Oct 2019;23(5):712-717

Introduction: Telehealth has been used nominally for trauma, neurological, and cardiovascular incidents in prehospital emergency medical services (EMS). Yet, much less is known about the use of telehealth for low-acuity primary care. We examine the development of one telehealth program and its impact on unnecessary ambulance transports.

Objective: The objective of this study is to describe the development and impact of a large- scale telehealth program on ambulance transports.

Methods: We describe the patient characteristics and results from a cohort of patients in Houston, Texas who received a prehospital telehealth consultation from an emergency medicine physician. Inclusion criteria were adults and pediatric patients with complaints considered to be non-urgent, primary care related. Data were analyzed for 36 months, from January 2015 through December 2017. Our primary dependent variable was the percentage of patients transported by ambulance. We used descriptive statistics to describe patient demographics, chi-square to examine differences between groups, and logistic regression to explore the effects with multivariate controls including age, gender, race, and chief complaint.

Results: A total of 15,067 patients were enrolled (53% female; average age 44 years ± 19 years) over the three-year period. The 3 primary chief complaints were based on abdominal pains (13% of cases), nausea/vomiting/diarrhea (NVD) (9.4%), and back pain (9.3%).

Ambulance transports represented 11.2% of all transports in the program, while alternative taxi transportation was used in 75.6%, and the remainder were self- or no-transports. Taxi transportation to an alternate, affiliated clinic (versus ED) was utilized in 5% of incidents. After multivariate controls, older age patients presenting with low-risk, non-acute chest pain, shortness of breath, and dizziness were much more likely to use ambulance transport. Race and gender were not significant predictors of ambulance transport.

Conclusions: We found telehealth offers a technology strategy to address potentially unnecessary ambulance transports. Based on prior cost-effectiveness analyses, the reduction of unnecessary ambulance transports translates to an overall reduction in EMS agency costs. Telehealth programs offer a viable solution to support alternate destination and alternate transport programs.