1. Return fire and take cover.
2. Direct or expect casualty to remain engaged as a combatant if appropriate.
3. Direct casualty to move to cover and apply self-aid if able or when tactically feasible, move or drag casualty to cover.
4. Try to keep the casualty from sustaining additional wounds.
5. Casualties should be extracted from burning vehicles or buildings and moved to places of relative safety. Do what is necessary to stop the burning process.
6. Stop life-threatening external hemorrhage if tactically feasible:
7. Airway management is generally best deferred until the Tactical Field Care phase.
Establish a security perimeter in accordance with unit tactical standard operating procedures and/or battle drills. Maintain tactical situational awareness.
Triage casualties as required. Casualties with an altered mental status should have weapons and communications equipment taken away immediately.
a. Assess for unrecognized hemorrhage and control all sources of bleeding. If not already done, use a CoTCCC-recommended limb tourniquet to control life- threatening external hemorrhage that is anatomically amenable to tourniquet use or for any traumatic amputation. Apply directly to the skin 2-3 inches above the bleeding site. If bleeding is not controlled with the first tourniquet, apply a second tourniquet side-by-side with the first.
b. For compressible (external) hemorrhage not amenable to limb tourniquet use or as an adjunct to tourniquet removal, use Combat Gauze as the CoTCCC hemostatic dressing of choice.
c. For external hemorrhage of the head and neck where the wound edges can be easily re-approximated, the iTClamp may be used as a primary option for hemorrhage control. Wounds should be packed with a hemostatic dressing or XStat, if appropriate, prior to iTClamp application.
d. Perform initial assessment for hemorrhagic shock (altered mental status in the absence of brain injury and/or weak or absent radial pulse) and consider immediate initiation of shock resuscitation efforts.
a. Assess for unobstructed airway.
b. If there is a traumatic airway obstruction or impending traumatic obstruction, prepare for possible direct airway intervention.
c. Allow a conscious casualty to assume any position that best protects the airway, to include sitting up and/or leaning forward.
d. Place unconscious casualty in the recovery position, head tilted back; chin away from chest.
e. Use suction if available and appropriate.
f. If the previous measures are unsuccessful, and the casualty’s airway obstruction (e.g. facial fractures, direct airway injury, blood, deformation or burns) is unmanageable, perform a surgical cricothyroidotomy using one of the following:
g. Frequently reassess SpO2, EtCO2, and airway patency as airway status may change over time.
h. Cervical spine stabilization is not necessary for casualties who have sustained only penetrating trauma.
a. Assess for tension pneumothorax and treat as necessary.
NOTE: If not treated promptly, tension pneumothorax may progress from respiratory distress to shock and traumatic cardiac arrest.
NOTE: Either the 5th intercostal space (ICS) in the anterior axillary line (AAL) or the 2nd ICS in the mid-clavicular line (MCL) may be used for needle decompression (NDC). If the anterior (MCL) site is used, do not insert the needle medial to the nipple line.
The needle/catheter unit should be inserted at an angle perpendicular to the chest wall and just over the top of the lower rib at the insertion site. Insert the needle/catheter unit all the way to the hub and hold it in place for 5-10 seconds to allow decompression to occur.
After the NDC has been performed, remove the needle and leave the catheter in place.
b. All open and/or sucking chest wounds should be treated by immediately applying a vented chest seal to cover the defect. If a vented chest seal is not available, use a non-vented chest seal. Monitor the casualty for the potential development of a subsequent tension pneumothorax. If the casualty develops increasing hypoxia, respiratory distress, or hypotension and a tension pneumothorax is suspected, treat by burping or removing the dressing or by needle decompression.
c. Initiate pulse oximetry. All individuals with moderate/severe TBI should be monitored with pulse oximetry. Readings may be misleading in the settings of shock or marked hypothermia.
d. Casualties with moderate/severe TBI should be given supplemental oxygen when available to maintain an oxygen saturation > 90%.
e. If the casualty has impaired ventilation and uncorrectable hypoxia with decreasing oxygen saturation below 90%, consider insertion of a properly sized Nasopharyngeal Airway, and ventilate using a 1000ml resuscitator Bag-Valve-Mask.
f. Use continuous EtCO2 and SpO2 monitoring to help assess airway patency.
OR
1. Cold stored low titer O whole blood
2. Pre-screened low titer O fresh whole blood
3. Plasma, red blood cells (RBCs) and platelets in a 1:1:1 ratio
4. Plasma and RBCs in a 1:1 ratio
5. Plasma or RBCs alone
NOTE: Hypothermia prevention measures [Section 7] should be initiated while fluid resuscitation is being accomplished.
If not in shock:
If in shock and blood products are available under an approved command or theater blood product administration protocol:
Given increased risk for a potentially lethal hemolytic reaction, transfusion of unscreened group O fresh whole blood or type specific fresh whole blood should only be performed under appropriate medical direction by trained personnel.
Transfusion should occur as soon as possible after life-threatening hemorrhage in order to keep the patient alive. If Rh negative blood products are not immediately available, Rh positive blood products should be used in hemorrhagic shock.
If a casualty with an altered mental status due to suspected TBI has a weak or absent radial pulse, resuscitate as necessary to restore and maintain a normal radial pulse. If BP monitoring is available, maintain a target systolic BP between 100-110 mmHg.
Reassess the casualty frequently to check for recurrence of shock. If shock recurs, re-check all external hemorrhage control measures to ensure that they are still effective and repeat the fluid resuscitation as outlined above.
a. Take early and aggressive steps to prevent further body heat loss and add external heat, when possible, for both trauma and severely burned casualties.
b. Minimize casualty’s exposure to cold ground, wind and air temperatures. Place insulation material between the casualty and any cold surface as soon as possible. Keep protective gear on or with the casualty if feasible.
c. Replace wet clothing with dry clothing, if possible, and protect from further heat loss.
d. Place an active heating blanket on the casualty’s anterior torso and under the arms in the axillae (to prevent burns, do not place any active heating source directly on the skin or wrap around the torso).
e. Enclose the casualty with the exterior impermeable enclosure bag.
f. As soon as possible, upgrade hypothermia enclosure system to a well-insulated enclosure system using a hooded sleeping bag or other readily available insulation inside the enclosure bag/external vapor barrier shell.
g. Pre-stage an insulated hypothermia enclosure system with external active heating for transition from the non-insulated hypothermia enclosure systems; seek to improve upon existing enclosure system when possible.
h. Use a battery-powered warming device to deliver IV/IO resuscitation fluids, in accordance with current CoTCCC guidelines, at flow rate up to 150 ml/min with a 38°C output temperature.
i. Protect the casualty from exposure to wind and precipitation on any evacuation platform.
(unable to follow commands with either evidence of head trauma or a blunt/blast mechanism)
a. Prevent hypoxemia (goal SpO2 >90-95%)
b. Prevent hypotension – maintain SBP 100-110 mmHg. Transfuse whole blood or plasma preferentially if casualty is in hemorrhagic shock. Otherwise use 1-2 L bolus of crystalloid if no evidence of hemorrhage or hemorrhagic shock.
c. Identify and treat herniation (declining neurologic status with asymmetric or fixed/dilated pupil(s), or posturing):
a. If a penetrating eye injury is noted or suspected:
a. Initiate advanced electronic monitoring if indicated and if monitoring equipment is available.
TCCC non-medical first responders should provide analgesia on the battlefield achieved by using:
TCCC Medical Personnel:
Option 1
Option 2
TCCC Combat Paramedics or Providers:
Option 3
Option 4
TCCC Combat Paramedics or Providers:
If an emergence phenomenon occurs, consider giving 0.5-2 mg IV/IO midazolam.
If continued dissociation is required, move to the Prolonged Casualty Care (PCC) analgesia and sedation guidelines.
Analgesia and sedation notes:
Antibiotics: recommended for all open combat wounds
a. If able to take PO meds:
b. If unable to take PO meds (shock, unconsciousness):
Check for additional wounds
a. Assess and treat as a trauma casualty with burns and not burn casualty with injuries.
b. Facial burns, especially those that occur in closed spaces, may be associated with inhalation injury. Aggressively monitor airway status and oxygen saturation in such patients and consider early surgical airway for respiratory distress or oxygen desaturation.
c. Estimate total body surface area (TBSA) burned to the nearest 10% using the Rule of Nines.
d. Cover the burn area with dry, sterile dressings. For extensive burns (>20%), consider placing the casualty in the Heat-Reflective Shell or Blizzard Survival Blanket from the Hypothermia Prevention Kit in order to both cover the burned areas and prevent hypothermia.
e. Fluid resuscitation (USAISR Rule of Ten)
f. Analgesia in accordance with the TCCC Guidelines in Section (10) may be administered to treat burn pain.
g. Prehospital antibiotic therapy is not indicated solely for burns, but antibiotics should be given per the TCCC guidelines in Section (11) if indicated to prevent infection in penetrating wounds.
h. All TCCC interventions can be performed on or through burned skin in a burn casualty.
i. Burn patients are particularly susceptible to hypothermia. Extra emphasis should be placed on barrier heat loss prevention methods.
Splint fractures and re-check pulses.
a. Resuscitation on the battlefield for victims of blast or penetrating trauma who have no pulse, no ventilations, and no other signs of life will not be successful and should not be attempted. However, casualties with torso trauma or polytrauma who have no pulse or respirations during TFC should have bilateral needle decompression performed to ensure they do not have a tension pneumothorax prior to discontinuation of care. The procedure is the same as described in section (5a) above.
a. Communicate with the casualty if possible. Encourage, reassure and explain care.
b. Communicate with tactical leadership as soon as possible and throughout casualty treatment as needed. Provide leadership with casualty status and evacuation requirements to assist with coordination of evacuation assets.
c. Communicate with the evacuation system (the Patient Evacuation Coordination Cell) to arrange for TACEVAC. Communicate with medical providers on the evacuation asset if possible and relay mechanism of injury, injuries sustained, signs/symptoms, and treatments rendered. Provide additional information as appropriate.
a. Document clinical assessments, treatments rendered, and changes in the casualty’s status on a TCCC Card (DD Form 1380).
b. Forward documentation with the casualty to the next level of care.
a. Complete and secure the TCCC Card (DD 1380) to the casualty.
b. Secure all loose ends of bandages and wraps.
c. Secure hypothermia prevention wraps/blankets/straps.
d. Secure litter straps as required. Consider additional padding for long evacuations.
e. Provide instructions to ambulatory patients as needed.
f. Stage casualties for evacuation in accordance with unit standard operating procedures.
g. Maintain security at the evacuation point in accordance with unit standard operating procedures.
The Tactical Evacuation Care Guidelines are now a separate document managed by the Committee on En Route Combat Casualty Care (CoERCCC).
TACEVAC Guidelines can be found in the En Route Care Collection on Deployed Medicine.
* The term “Tactical Evacuation” includes both Casualty Evacuation (CASEVAC) and Medical Evacuation (MEDEVAC) as defined in Joint Publication 4-02.
a. Tactical force personnel should establish evacuation point security and stage
casualties for evacuation.
b. Tactical force personnel or the medic should communicate patient information and status to TACEVAC personnel as clearly as possible. The minimum information communicated should include stable or unstable, injuries identified, and treatments rendered.
c. TACEVAC personnel should stage casualties on evacuation platforms as required.
d. Secure casualties in the evacuation platform in accordance with unit policies, platform configurations and safety requirements.
e. TACEVAC medical personnel should re-assess casualties and re-evaluate all injuries and previous interventions.
Endotracheal intubation may be considered in lieu of cricothyroidotomy if trained.
Most combat casualties do not require supplemental oxygen, but administration of oxygen may be of benefit for the following types of casualties:
(same as Tactical Field Care)
Casualties with torso trauma or polytrauma who have no pulse or respirations during TACEVAC should have bilateral needle decompression performed to ensure they do not have a tension pneumothorax. The procedure is the same as described in Section (4a) above.
CPR may be attempted during this phase of care if the casualty does not have obviously fatal wounds and will be arriving at a facility with a surgical capability within a short period of time. CPR should not be done at the expense of compromising the mission or denying lifesaving care to other casualties.
Communicate with the casualty if possible. Encourage, reassure and explain care.
Communicate with medical providers at the next level of care as feasible and relay mechanism of injury, injuries sustained, signs/symptoms, and treatments rendered. Provide additional information as appropriate
4. Airway Management
5. Respiration / Breathing in tactical field care
adds Moderate and Severe Traumatic Brain Injury to tactical field care.
3. Massive Hemorrhage
b. “CoTCCC-Recommended” is removed from junctional tourniquets. No specific products are recommended by the CoTCCC. End users should select any FDA-approved device that is indicated for junctional hemorrhage control.
4. Airway Management
d. Removes Cric-Key technique as preferred option for surgical cricothyroidotomy and remove “least desirable option” from the standard open surgical technique. Units and end users should use the technique they are best trained to execute.
Airway Notes: Removes iGel as the preferred extraglottic airway. Units may still use iGel if mission are at high elevation or evacuation is at high altitudes.
6. Analgesia – adjust Ketamine IV/IO dosing to 20-30 mg (or 0.2 – 0.3 mg/kg)
12. Inspect and dress known wounds
b. Adds the preference of cleaning abdominal evisceration with clean and warm water if possible; clarifies guidance on conditions to attempt reduction of abdominal contents; that patient should remain NPO and NOT be administered oral medicals (Combat Wound Medication pack) and removes prolonged care considerations (now covered in separate PCC guidelines).
Brendon Drew, DO; Jonathan Auten, DO; Benjamin Donham, MD; Andre Cap, MD, PhD;Travis Deaton, MD; Warren Dorlac, MD; Joseph DuBose, MD, FACS, FCCM;Andrew D. Fisher, MD, PA-C; Alan J. Ginn; James Hancock, MD; John B. Holcomb, MD;John Knight, MD; Ryan Knight, MD; Albert “Ken” Koerner, MD; Lanny Littlejohn, MD;Matthew J. Martin, MD; John Morey; Jonathan Morrison, MD; Martin Schreiber, MD;Philip C. Spinella, MD, FCCM; Ben Walrath, MPH, MD; Frank Butler, MD
Journal of Special Operations Medicine
The literature continues to provide strong support for the early use of tranexamic acid (TXA) in severely injured trauma patients. (1) Questions persist, however, regarding the optimal medical and tactical/logistical use, timing, and dose of this medication, both from the published TXA literature and from the TCCC user community. The use of TXA has been explored outside of trauma, new dosing strategies have been pursued, and expansion of retrospective use data has grown as well. These questions emphasize the need for a reexamination of TXA by the CoTCCC. The most significant updates to the TCCC Guidelines are (i) including significant traumatic brain injury (TBI) as an indication for TXA, (ii) changing the dosing protocol to a single 2g IV/IO administration, and (iii) providing for administration via IV/IO push.
NEW Wording to TCCC Guidelines:
Tactical Field Care & TACEVAC Care
c. Tranexamic Acid (TXA)
•If a casualty will likely need a blood transfusion (for example: presents with hemorrhagic shock, elevated lactate, one or more major amputations, penetrating torso trauma, or evidence of severe bleeding)
OR
•If the casualty has signs or symptoms of significant TBI or has altered metal status associated with blast injury or blunt trauma:
–Administer 2g of tranexamic acid via slow IV or IO push as soon as possible but NOT later than 3 hours after injury.
B. L. Bennett, PhD; Gordon Giesbrecht, PhD; Ken Zafren, MD; Ryan Christensen; Lanny Littlejohn, MD; Brendon Drew, DO; Andrew Cap, MD, PhD; Ethan Miles, MD;Frank Butler, MD; John B. Holcomb, MD; Stacy Shackelford, MD
Journal of Special Operations Medicine
As an outcome of combat injury and hemorrhagic shock, trauma-induced hypothermia (TIH) and the associated coagulopathy and acidosis result in significantly increased risk for death. In an effort to manage TIH, the Hypothermia Prevention and Management Kit™ (HPMK) was implemented in 2006 for battlefield casualties. Recent feedback from operational forces indicates that limitations exist in the HPMK to maintain thermal balance in cold environments, due to the lack of insulation. Consequently, based on lessons learned, some US Special Operations Forces are now upgrading the HPMK after short-term use (60 minutes) by adding insulation around the casualty during training in cold environments. Furthermore, new research indicates that the current HPMK, although better than no hypothermia protection, was ranked last in objective and subjective measures in volunteers when compared with commercial and user-assembled external warming enclosure systems. On the basis of these observations and research findings, the Committee on Tactical Combat Casualty Care decided to review the hypothermia prevention and management guidelines in 2018 and to update them on the basis of these facts and that no update has occurred in 14 years. Recommendations are made for minimal costs, low cube and weight solutions to create an insulated HPMK, or when the HPMK is not readily available, to create an improvised hypothermia (insulated) enclosure system.
NEW Wording to TCCC Guidelines:
Tactical Field Care & Tactical Evacuation Care
7. Hypothermia Prevention
a. Take early and aggressive steps to prevent additional body heat loss and add external heat when possible for trauma and severely burned casualties.
b. Minimize casualty’s exposure to cold ground, wind, and air temperatures. Place insulation material between the casualty and any cold surface as soon as possible. Keep protective gear on or with the casualty if feasible.
c. Replace wet clothing with dry clothing, if possible, and protect from additional heat loss.
d. Place an active heating blanket on the casualty’s anterior torso and under the arms in the axillae (to prevent burns, do not place any active heating source directly on the skin or wrap around the torso).
e. Enclose the casualty in the exterior impermeable enclosure bag.
f. As soon as possible, upgrade a hypothermia enclosure system to a well-insulated enclosure system using a hooded sleeping bag or other readily available insulation inside the enclosure bag/external vapor-barrier shell.
g. Pre-stage an insulated hypothermia enclosure system with external active heating for transition from the noninsulated hypothermia enclosure systems; seek to improve on existing enclosure system when possible.
h. Use a battery-powered warming device to deliver IV resuscitation fluids, in accordance with current CoTCCC guidelines, at flow rate up to 150mL/min with a 38°C (100°F) output temperature.
i. Protect the casualty from exposure to wind and precipitation on any evacuation platform.
Andrew D. Fisher, MD; Taylor T. DesRosiers, MD; Wayne Papalski; Michael A. Remley; Steven G. Schauer, DO; Virginia Blackman, PhD; Jacob Brown, 18D; Frank K. Butler, MD; Cord W. Cunningham, MD; Erin M. Eickhoff, DNP, RN; Jennifer M. Gurney, MD; John B. Holcomb, MD; Patricia N. Meza, PhD, RN; Harold R. Montgomery, ATP; Meg Moore, MD; Sergey M. Motov, MD; Tim Sprunger; Stacy A. Shackelford, MD; Brendon G. Drew, DO
Jamie Riesberg, MD; Brian Eastridge, MD; Meg Moore, MD; Marc Northern, MD; Dana Onifer, MD; William Gephardt, PA, RN; Erin Eickhoff; Michael Remley, NRP; Carl Miller
Historically about 20% of combat wounds are abdominal injuries. Abdominal evisceration (AE) may be expected to complicate as many as 1/3 of battle-related abdominal wounds. Evisceration is an injury with potential for improved outcomes if managed appropriately in the pre-hospital phases.
While not as extensively studied as other forms of combat injury, abdominal evisceration management recommendations extend back to at least Word War I, when it was recognized as a significant cause of morbidity especially associated with bayonet injury. More recently, abdominal evisceration has been noted as a not infrequent result of penetrating ballistic trauma.
In an effort to manage abdominal eviscerations, the US Military Services have each published recommendations for the pre-hospital provider, medic and corpsman. Initial management of abdominal evisceration consists of assessing for and controlling associated hemorrhage, covering the eviscerated abdominal contents with a moist, sterile barrier, and carefully reassessing the patient. Attempting to establish a standard of care for non-medical and medical first responders and to leverage current wound packaging technologies, the Committee on Tactical Combat Casualty Care (CoTCCC) conducted a systematic review of historical Service guidelines and recent medical studies that include abdominal evisceration. Recommendations are made for overall management and specific wound dressing considerations.
Harold R. Montgomery, ATP; Brendon G. Drew, DO; Jeremy Torrisi, ATP; Matthew G. Adams, NREMT; Shawn Anderson, NRP; Michael A. Remley, NRP; Thomas A. Rich, NRP; Dominic Thompson, NRP; Dominique Greydanus, 18D; Travis Shaw, NRP; Tom Culpepper, NRP; Frank K. Butler, MD
Dana Onifer, MD; Jessica McKee, BA, MSc; Lindsey (Kyle) Faudree, PA-C; Brad Bennett, PhD; Ethan Miles, MD; Toran Jacobsen, SO-ATP; John “Kip” Morey, SO-ATP; Frank Butler, MD.
Journal of Special Operations Medicine
J Spec Oper Med. Fall 2019, Volume 19, Edition 3.
The 2012 study Death on the battlefield (2001–2011) by Eastridge et al. demonstrated that 7.5% of the prehospital deaths caused by potentially survivable injuries were due to external hemorrhage from the cervical region. The increasing use of Tactical Combat-Casualty Care (TCCC) and other medical interventions have dramatically reduced the overall rate of combat-related mortality in US forces; however, uncontrolled hemorrhage remains the number one cause of potentially survivable combat trauma. Additionally, the use of personal protective equipment and adaptations in the weapons used against US forces has caused changes in the wound distribution patterns seen in combat trauma. There has been a significant proportional increase in head and neck wounds, which may result in difficult to control hemorrhage. More than 50% of combat wounded personnel will receive a head or neck wound. The iTClamp (Innovative Trauma Care Inc., Edmonton, Alberta, Canada) is the first and only hemorrhage control device that uses the hydrostatic pressure of a hematoma to tamponade bleeding from an injured vessel within a wound. The iTClamp is US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) approved for use on multiple sites and works in all compressible areas, including on large and irregular lacerations. The iTClamp’s unique design makes it ideal for controlling external hemorrhage in the head and neck region. The iTClamp has been demonstrated effective in over 245 field applications. The device is small and lightweight, easy to apply, can be used by any level of first responder with minimal training, and facilitates excellent skills retention. The iTClamp reapproximates wound edges with four pairs of opposing needles. This mechanism of action has demonstrated safe application for both the patient and the provider, causes minimal pain, and does not result in tissue necrosis, even if the device is left in place for extended periods. The Committee on TCCC recommends the use of the iTClamp as a primary treatment modality, along with a CoTCCC-recommended hemostatic dressing and direct manual pressure (DMP), for hemorrhage control in craniomaxillofacial injuries and penetrating neck injuries with external hemorrhage.
Frank K. Butler, MD, John Holcomb, MD, Stacy Shackelford, MD, Harold R. Montgomery, ATP, Shawn Anderson, NREMT-P, Jeff Cain, MD, Howard Champion, MD, Cord Cunningham, MD, Warren Dorlac, Brendon Drew, MD, Kurt Edwards, MD, John Gandy, MD, Elon Glassberg, MD, Jennifer Gurney, MD, Theodore Harcke, MD, Don Jenkins, MD, Jay Johannigman, MD, Bijan Kheirabadi, MD, Russ Kotwal, MD, Lanny Littlejohn, MD, Matthew Martin, MD, Edward Mazuchowski, MD, Edward Otten, MD, Travis Polk, MD, Kyle Remick, MD, Peter Rhee, MD, Jason Seery, MD, Zsolt Stockinger, MD, Jeremy Torrisi, ATP, Avi Yitzak, MD, Ken Zafren, MD, Scott Zietlow, MD.
Journal of Special Operations Medicine
This change to the Tactical Combat Casualty Care (TCCC) Guidelines that updates the recommendations for management of suspected tension pneumothorax for combat casualties in the prehospital setting does the following things:
1. Continues the aggressive approach to suspecting and treating tension pneumothorax based on mechanism of injury and respiratory distress that TCCC has advocated for in the past, as opposed to waiting until shock develops as a result of the tension pneumothorax before treating. The new wording does, however, emphasize that shock and cardiac arrest may ensue if the tension pneumothorax is not treated promptly.
2. Adds additional emphasis to the importance of the current TCCC recommendation to perform needle decompression (NDC) on both sides of the chest on a combat casualty with torso trauma who suffers a traumatic cardiac arrest before reaching a medical treatment facility.
3. Adds a 10 gauge, 3.25 inch needle/catheter unit as an alternative to the previously recommended 14 gauge, 3.25 inch needle/catheter unit as recommended devices for needle decompression.
4. Designates the location at which NDC should be performed as either the lateral site (5th intercostal space {ICS} at the anterior axillary line {AAL}) or the anterior site (2nd ICS at the midclavicular line {MCL}). For the reasons enumerated in the body of the change paper, participants on the 14 December 2017 TCCC Working Group teleconference favored including both potential sites for NDC without specifying a preferred site.
5. Adds two key elements to the description of the NDC procedure: insert the needle/catheter unit at a perpendicular angle to the chest wall all the way to the hub, then hold the needle/catheter unit in place for 5-10 seconds before removing the needle in order to allow for full decompression of the pleural space to occur.
6. Defines what constitutes a successful NDC, using specific metrics such as: an observed hiss of air escaping from the chest during the NDC procedure; a decrease in respiratory distress; an increase in hemoglobin oxygen saturation; and/or an improvement in signs of shock that may be present.
7. Recommends that only two needle decompressions be attempted before continuing on to the “Circulation” portion of the TCCC Guidelines. After two NDCs have been performed, the combat medical provider should proceed to the fourth element in the “MARCH” algorithm and evaluate/treat the casualty for shock as outlined in the Circulation section of the TCCC Guidelines. Eastridge’s landmark 2012 paper documented that noncompressible hemorrhage caused many more combat fatalities than tension pneumothorax.
Since the manifestations of hemorrhagic shock and shock from tension pneumothorax may be similar, the TCCC Guidelines now recommend proceeding to treatment for hemorrhagic shock (when present) after two NDCs have been performed.
8. Adds a paragraph to the end of the Circulation section of the TCCC Guidelines that calls for consideration of untreated tension pneumothorax as a potential cause for shock that has not responded to fluid resuscitation. This is an important aspect of treating shock in combat casualties that was not presently addressed in the TCCC Guidelines.
9. Adds finger thoracostomy (simple thoracostomy) and chest tubes as additional treatment options to treat suspected tension pneumothorax when further treatment is deemed necessary after two unsuccessful NDC attempts – if the combat medical provider has the skills, experience, and authorizations to perform these advanced interventions and the casualty is in shock. These two more invasive procedures are recommended only when the casualty is in refractory shock, not as the initial treatment.
Edward J. Otten, MD, Harold R. Montgomery, ATP, Frank K. Butler, MD.
Journal of Special Operations Medicine
Extraglottic airway (EGA) devices have been used by both physicians and prehospital providers for several decades. The original TCCC Guidelines published in 1996 included a recommendation to use the laryngeal mask airway (LMA) as an option to assist in securing the airway in Tactical Evacuation (TACEVAC) phase of care.
A variety of EGAs have been used in combat casualty care over the past 20 years. In 2012, the Committee on TCCC (CoTCCC) and the Defense Health Board (DHB) reaffirmed support for the use of supraglottic airway (SGA) devices in the TACEVAC phase of TCCC, but did not recommend a specific SGA based on the evidence available at that point in time. This paper will use the more inclusive term “extraglottic airway” instead of the term “supragottic airway” used in the DHB memo.
Current evidence suggests that the i-gel EGA performs as well or better than the other EGAs available and has other advantages in ease of training, size and weight, cost, safety, and simplicity of use. The gel-filled cuff in the i-gel both eliminates the need for cuff pressure monitoring during flight and reduces the risk of pressure-induced neuropraxia to cranial nerves in the oropharynx as a complication of EGA use. The i-gel thus makes the medic’s tasks simpler and frees him or her from the requirement to carry a cuff manometer as part of the medical kit.
Summary of Changes
1) Adds extraglottic airways (EGAs) as an option for airway management in Tactical Field Care;
2) Recommends the i-gel as the preferred EGA in TCCC because its gel-filled cuff makes it simpler to use than EGAs with air-filled cuffs and also eliminates the need for monitoring of cuff pressure;
3) Notes that should an EGA with an air-filled cuff be used, the pressure in the cuff must be monitored, especially during and after changes in altitude during casualty transport;
4) Emphasizes COL Bob Mabry’s often-made point that extraglottic airways will not be tolerated by a casualty unless he or she is deeply unconscious and notes that an NPA is a better option if there is doubt about whether or not the casualty will tolerate an EGA;
5) Adds the use of suction as an adjunct to airway management when available and appropriate (i.e., when needed to remove blood and vomitus);
6) Clarifies the wording regarding cervical spine stabilization to emphasize that it is not needed for casualties who have sustained only penetrating trauma (without blunt force trauma);
7) Reinforces that surgical cricothyroidotomies should not be performed simply because a casualty is unconscious;
8) Provides a reminder that, for casualties with facial trauma or facial burns with suspected inhalation injury, neither NPAs nor EGAs may be adequate for airway management, and a surgical cricothyroidotomy may be required;
9) Adds that pulse oximetry monitoring is a useful adjunct to assess airway patency and that capnography should also be used in the TACEVAC phase of care;
10) Reinforces that a casualty’s airway status may change over time and that he or she should be frequently re-assessed.
Harold R. Montgomery, ATP, Frank K. Butler, MD, Win Kerr, ATP, Curtis C. Conklin, ATP, Daniel Morissette, ATP, Michael A. Remley, ATP, Travis A. Shaw, NREMT-P and Thomas A. Rich, NREMT-P.
Journal of Special Operations Medicine
Based on careful review of the Tactical Combat Casualty Care (TCCC) Guidelines, the authors developed a list of proposed changes for inclusion in a comprehensive change proposal. To be included in the proposal, individual changes had to meet at least one of three criteria: (1) The change was primarily tactical rather than clinical; (2) the change was a minor modification to the language of an existing TCCCGuideline; and (3) the change, though clinical, was straightforward and noncontentious. The authors presented their list to the TCCC Working Group for review and approval at the 7 September 2016 meeting of the Committee on Tactical Combat Casualty Care (CoTCCC). Twenty-three items met with general agreement and were retained in this change proposal.
Summary of Changes
1. Add establishing a security perimeter to the beginning of tactical field care (TFC).
2. Specify securing both weapons and communications equipment of casualties with altered mental status in TFC.
3. Add a “Massive Hemorrhage” paragraph as the first medical intervention in TFC and tactical evacuation(TACEVAC) care.
4. Change the Breathing section title to Respiration/Breathing.
5. Change the Bleeding section title to Circulation.Make the first subsection “Bleeding” and include in it pelvic binders, replacing or doubling limb tourniquets, converting tourniquets, and recording times of tourniquet events. Follow the Bleeding subsection with the subsections IV Access, TXA (tranexamic acid), and Fluid Resuscitation.
6. Shift the initiation of pulse oximetry to the Respiration/Breathing section.
7. Add known or suspected smoke inhalation as an indication for supplemental oxygen when available.
8. Replace the term wound site with bleeding site throughout the TCCC Guidelines when addressing hemorrhage control.
9. Add “Remove tourniquet if it was never actually needed to control bleeding” to the subsection Bleeding.
10. Modify “check a distal pulse if possible” to specify that the “if possible” caveat applies to a traumatic amputation.
11. Clarify that XSTAT®, unlike other hemostatic dressings,should not be removed by Combat medical personnel in the field after it has been applied, but more XSTAT may be added and/or a different hemostatic dressing applied over the XSTAT.
12. Clarify tourniquet documentation requirements.
13. Specify the indications for establishing intravenous(IV) or intraosseous (IO) access.
14. Clarify the wording regarding time urgency and the duration of infusion of TXA.
15. Specify that hypothermia prevention should generally be undertaken concurrently with fluid resuscitation when the latter is indicated.
16. Eliminate cefotetan as a recommended antibiotic option.
17. Add a requirement to document the results of the rapid field test of visual acuity in known or suspected eye injuries.
18. Recommend advanced electronic monitoring in TFC if and when the technology is available in this phase.
19. Change the name of the oral medication package from “Combat Pill Pack” to “Combat Wound Medication Pack.”
20. Expand the communication paragraph in TFC to include communicating with tactical leadership and the evacuation system, as well as with the casualty.Add a similar paragraph to TACEVAC.
21. Add a section on preparing the casualty for evacuation to the end of TFC.
22. Add a section on transition of care to the beginning of TACEVAC.
23. Rearrange the Guidelines as needed to reflect the actual priority of clinical interventions.