PRIORITIES
Maintain high index of suspicion based upon the mechanism of injury.
Eye Exam
Management
Prevent Eye Injuries
“Keep an eye out” for eye trauma.
VISION
Intraocular Pressure (IOP)
Pupils
Test for relative afferent pupillary defect (RAPD) using swinging flashlight test. (See RAPD Testing.)
Extraocular motility
If patient can follow commands, ask to follow your finger without moving the head. Record any restrictions to movement.
Examination
Examine for critical findings. Perform focused eye exam “outside to inside.”
SHIELD AND SHIP
SHIELD AND SHIP vision-threatening eye injuries 10-11
Figures 1 & 2. Eye armor will help prevent many, but not all, eye injuries. If any kind of injury involves any portion of the face that would otherwise be covered by protective spectacles or goggles, maintain high level of suspicion – regardless of obvious severity.
MECHANISM
EXAM FINDINGS
MANAGEMENT 14-19
Figures: Open globe.
HISTORY
High index of suspicion if blast injury, shrapnel, or metal-on-metal injury.
EXAM
MANAGEMENT 37,38
Figures: Intraocular foreign body. Findings may be subtle.
EXAM
MANAGEMENT
Figures: Chemical injury.
HISTORY
Most common cause is retrobulbar hemorrhage/orbital hemorrhage.
EXAM
MANAGEMENT
EXAM
MANAGEMENT
EXAM
MANAGEMENT
Figures: Orbital fracture.
EXAM
Note if laceration involves eyelid margin or nasolacrimal system.
MANAGEMENT
Figures: Eyelid laceration.
EXAM
MANAGEMENT
EXAM
MANAGEMENT
Figures: Corneal abrasion.
These conditions are commonly associated with contact lens wear or overuse. Numerous regulations prohibit or limit wear during deployment, but contact lens use during deployment continues to be common.
EXAM
MANAGEMENT
EXAM
MANAGEMENT
EXAM
Intraorbital foreign body visible on examination or identified on diagnostic imaging such as X-ray or CT.
MANAGEMENT
History
Vision loss after eye trauma
Exam
Management
History
Blurred vision or loss of vision, halos around lights, severe eye pain, severe headache, eye redness, nausea and vomiting.
Exam
Management
EXAM
MANAGEMENT
EXAM
MANAGEMENT
Figures 27, 28, 29: APEL labeling. U.S. Army Photo by PEO Soldier.
Figure 31. Eye shields.
SUPPLIES NEEDED USING MORGAN LENS
SUPPLES NEEDED
Steps
Figure 32a-c. Continuous irrigation for chemical injury using nasal cannula.
Due to the requirement to move the coalition patient with vision-threatening injuries to a Role 3 with an ophthalmologist in theater or Role 4 outside the area of responsibility (AOR), early and safe transport of these patients should involve consideration of several factors.
Population of Interest
INTENT (EXPECTED OUTCOMES)
PERFORMANCE/ADHERENCE MEASURES
DATA SOURCES
SYSTEM REPORTING & FREQUENCY
The above constitutes the minimum criteria for PI monitoring of this CPG. System reporting will be performed annually; additional PI monitoring and system reporting may be performed as needed.
The system review and data analysis will be performed by the Joint Trauma System (JTS) Chief, JTS Program Manager, and the JTS PI Branch.
It is the trauma team leader’s responsibility to ensure familiarity, appropriate compliance and PI monitoring at the local level with this CPG.
PURPOSE
The purpose of this Appendix is to ensure an understanding of DoD policy and practice regarding inclusion in CPGs of “off-label” uses of U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA)–approved products. This applies to off-label uses with patients who are armed forces members.
BACKGROUND
Unapproved (i.e. “off-label”) uses of FDA-approved products are extremely common in American medicine and are usually not subject to any special regulations. However, under Federal law, in some circumstances, unapproved uses of approved drugs are subject to FDA regulations governing “investigational new drugs.” These circumstances include such uses as part of clinical trials, and in the military context, command required, unapproved uses. Some command requested unapproved uses may also be subject to special regulations.
ADDITIONAL INFORMATION REGARDING OFF-LABEL USES IN CPGS
The inclusion in CPGs of off-label uses is not a clinical trial, nor is it a command request or requirement. Further, it does not imply that the Military Health System requires that use by DoD health care practitioners or considers it to be the “standard of care.” Rather, the inclusion in CPGs of off-label uses is to inform the clinical judgment of the responsible health care practitioner by providing information regarding potential risks and benefits of treatment alternatives. The decision is for the clinical judgment of the responsible health care practitioner within the practitioner-patient relationship.
ADDITIONAL PROCEDURES
Balanced Discussion
Consistent with this purpose, CPG discussions of off-label uses specifically state that they are uses not approved by the FDA. Further, such discussions are balanced in the presentation of appropriate clinical study data, including any such data that suggest caution in the use of the product and specifically including any FDA-issued warnings.
Quality Assurance Monitoring
With respect to such off-label uses, DoD procedure is to maintain a regular system of quality assurance monitoring of outcomes and known potential adverse events. For this reason, the importance of accurate clinical records is underscored.
Information to Patients
Good clinical practice includes the provision of appropriate information to patients. Each CPG discussing an unusual off-label use will address the issue of information to patients. When practicable, consideration will be given to including in an appendix an appropriate information sheet for distribution to patients, whether before or after use of the product. Information to patients should address in plain language: a) that the use is not approved by the FDA; b) the reasons why a DoD health care practitioner would decide to use the product for this purpose; and c) the potential risks associated with such use.